Watch coloured water move through different paper strips

Cut equal-width strips and place each end into the same depth of coloured water. Keep the supports upright and mark the initial visible liquid level.

Suspend two identical widths of paper over shallow containers at the same depth. Sketch your apparatus before you start and use the sketch to identify where each observation will be made. Write down the starting state before changing it. If another person repeats the trial, knowing the relative positions can matter more than the brand or appearance of the materials.

An early lead can disappear when the faster-moving strip starts to spread sideways. Write the independent change at the start of each row and keep the outcome beside it. Include anything about a failed run that would matter to somebody repeating the setup. If you later make a neat graph, keep the rough record as well so it remains possible to inspect the reasons for leaving out a point.

Measure the furthest coloured point at fixed times and note whether the colour travels as a narrow edge or a diffuse band. Use separate strips for repeat trials.

Water lifted by the container edge can be mistaken for flow within the paper. Decide how to mark an observation when two readings fall too close together to separate. Even spacing on a sheet is useful only to the extent you can see where a feature crosses each line. A visible range can carry more meaning than a single estimated digit that your instrument cannot resolve.

Keep the strips away from the vessel wall and compare their centres. Put the observations into order and keep the raw measurements or drawings. A result can be useful at more than one level. The direction of a change may be unmistakable while the exact size is uncertain. Describe the strongest pattern the records support and qualify measurements that depend on a faint boundary or a moving object.

Use marked photographs to record where the colour was strong enough to see at each time. A useful prediction can say which direction an effect should move without specifying its exact size. Put that prediction next to the expected observation time or distance. If the pattern appears in the other direction, note how you would test whether it arose from a measurement condition or from your original explanation.

Write a row for each run and keep apparently odd results in the record. Mark things that went wrong, such as a shifted surface, uneven starting point or missed time, before judging the pattern. Changing how you record the behaviour halfway through can make two otherwise similar trials difficult to compare. Explain the outcome in a sentence that a reader can check against the figures or sketch. Use a second sentence for a proposed cause. If you can imagine a different cause that fits the same observations, describe a small test that would help distinguish the two. Comparing those predictions can make a follow-up clearer than simply repeating the same demonstration. Use a separate colour mark for the highest visible liquid front if dye particles lag behind. Paper often makes those boundaries hard to separate. If the results vary, look for a second feature that moved along with the one you meant to change. That can be the distance to an observer, the angle of a support or the way the material moves between runs. Isolate it in a small follow-up trial when possible.

Sketch the strips after they dry and see whether the dried patterns match your timed measurements. Make a simple model of what you believe happens between the starting and final positions. Then check one point at which that model gives a visible consequence. A single carefully observed intermediate position can be more revealing than comparing two widely separated endpoints with an unknown change between them.